common name: lovebug
scientific name: Plecia nearctica Hardy (Insecta: Diptera: Bibionidae)
Plecia nearctica is the lovebug that motorists frequently encounter as a serious nuisance when traveling in southern states. It was first described by Hardy (1940) from Galveston, Texas, and at that time he reported it to be widely spread, but more common in Texas and Louisiana than other Gulf Coast states. It has now progressed to all states bordering on the Gulf of Mexico, as well as Georgia, South Carolina, and parts of Central America. Hetrick (1970a) studied the biology of P. nearctica, and estimated that flights reached altitudes of 300 to 450 meters, extended several kilometers over the Gulf of Mexico and covered one-fourth the land area of Florida. Today it is found throughout Florida. It has been erroneously reported that the lovebug was introduced into Florida by University of Florida entomologists. Buschman (1976) documented the progressive movement of the lovebug around the Gulf Coast into Florida. Research was conducted by the University of Florida and U.S. Department of Agriculture entomologists after the lovebug was well established in Florida. It was first collected in Florida during 1949, in Escambia County, the western-most county of the panhandle.
car headlight
Thompson (1975) reported over 200 species in the genus Plecia. There are only two species of Plecia in the U.S.A., P. nearctica and P. americana Hardy. Their ranges are similar, but americana extends northeastward to North Carolina and south to Mexico, whereas nearctica ranges farther south to Costa Rica. P. americana is a woodland species that does not seem to be a problem on highways. Each of two generations of P. nearctica lasts about four weeks in May and September. In addition to large emergences in May and September, it has been collected in Florida every month of the year except November (Buschman 1976). Buschman stated that throughout its extensive range, P. americana has been collected only in April, May, and June, with no evidence of a fall emergence. Thus, lovebugs that emerge in the fall are P. nearctica. He added that most of the spring collection dates of P. americana in north central Florida are two or three weeks earlier than similar dates for P. nearctica. A description and key to these two species are provided at the end of this file.
Another bibionid, Dilophus sayi Hardy (1966) [=Dilophus orbatus Osten Sacken;=Philia orbata (Osten Sacken)] is a March fly (Bibionidae) in which the behavior of the adults is somewhat similar to that of P. nearctica, but the adults do not congregate noticeably on highways. In Florida, populations of D. sayi peak from late January through April, but can be observed most of the year beginning with cooler weather in October. Most Florida records are in the peninsula south to Dade County. D. sayi is smaller than Plecia spp., and has an all-black body, lacking the reddish color of the thoracic region of Plecia. The males of D. sayi are smaller than the females and have clear wings as apposed to the brown fumose wings of the females. We have observed D. sayi attracted to recently parked cars in Gainesville, Florida, and to barbecue grills. Thornhill (1976a) in studies at Gainesville, Florida stated that aggregates of up to 300 larvae of D. sayi could be found on or near the surface of the soil among the roots of grasses. Under lab conditions adult females lived about 72 hours and adult males about 92. Both Thornhill and Rothamel (1969) gave details on orientation and coupling of D. sayi. This bibionid attains nuisance numbers as adults in Florida and elsewhere from South Carolina south and west to Texas and California. Complaints about the larvae and adults of D. sayi (reported as D. orbatus) were statewide in California during October of 1970 (USDA Cooperative Economic Insect Report 20797). In this same volume of C.E.I.R., there were numerous reports of it being a problem during autumn in sod and lawns, including one report of 1,000 larvae per square meter in a nursery at Oakland, Alameda County, California. This species, however, is of minor importance, compared to P. nearctica, which is a major nuisance on Florida highways.
P. nearctica is known from Costa Rico, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and the southeastern U.S.A. in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas. This species has also been reported as far north as Wilmington, North Carolina (Mousseau 2006).
Thompson (1975) illustrated and prepared a key for the two species of Plecia that occur in the U.S.A. His key and illustrations are used here with his permission.
adults in copula
Lovebugs vary considerably in size; males weigh 6 to 10 mg and females 15 to 25 mg. The weight difference between sexes is largely due to the ovaries which contain 70 percent of the total protein. Neither sex has the ability to store lipids in fat body cells (Van Handel 1976).

Larva of Plecia nearctica. Color slate gray with darker head.
Length of full-grown larva: 11 to 12 mm.
larvae
1. Thorax with dorsum rufous and pleura extensively black; head with oral margin distinctly produced forward . Male genitalia with 9th tergum not as broad as in americana, just slightly broader than long, with shallow medial excavation and ventromedial flap, not produced ventrolaterally; 9th sternum with dorsolateral lobe extending under 9th tergum, produced ventromedially into a narrow forked process; telomeres large, L- shaped in lateral view. Female genitalia with 9th tergum large, almost completely concealing cerci in lateral view, strongly excavated dorsomedially; cerci small, narrow in dorsal view; 8th sternum small, with a shallow medial excavation; ovipositor lobes broad, blunt apically and strongly sclerotized dorsally . . . . . nearctica Hardy
1'. Thorax almost completely rufous, rarely slightly brownish black on metathoracic pleura; head with oral margin not produced forward, but evenly convex. Male genitalia with 9th tergum much broader than in nearctica, almost twice as broad as long, with a deep medial excavation and without a ventromedial flap, ventrolateral corners produced posteriorly; 9th sternum with a dorsolateral lobe, not produced ventromedially and without a medial forked process, but with a broad ventromedial excavation; telemeres small, almost completely round. Female genitalia with 9th tergum small, not concealing cerci in lateral view, not excavated medially; cerci large, broad in dorsal view; 8th sternum large, with a deep and narrow medial excavation; ovipositor lobes narrow, acute apically, not strongly sclerotized dorsally
. . . . . americana Hardy
heads and wings
male genitalia
female genitalia
Callahan and Denmark (1973) reported that ambient temperatures above 28°C and visible light at above 20,000 Lux (2000 ft-C) stimulated lovebug flight but not orientation behavior. Lovebugs are attracted to irradiated automobile exhaust fumes (diesel and gasoline) when the ultraviolet light incident over the highway ranges from 0.3 to 0.4 microns (3000 to 4000 angstroms (A)) between 10 AM and 4 PM, with a temperature above 28°C. Hot engines and the vibrations of automobiles apparently contribute to the attraction of lovebugs to highways. Solar radiation below 2.9 microns (2900 A) does not penetrate the atmosphere. Callahan et al. (1985) reported that formaldehyde and heptaldehyde were the two most attractive components of diesel exhaust.
The following description of reproductive behavior was taken largely from Leppla et al. (1974), who reported on a daily rhythmicity of flight, mating, and feeding of lovebugs in the laboratory and in the field, which coincided with the ambient temperature of 19°C and an incident light intensity range of 15,000 to 20,000 Lux (1500-2000 ft-C). Adult males begin hovering between 8:00 to 10:00 AM EDT. Males orient into the wind 0.3 to 0.9 meters above ground level. This behavior tends to cease after 10 AM and a resurgence occurs at 4:00 to 5:00 PM and lasts until about 8:00 PM. Females do nor hover but crawl up vegetation and take flight through the swarm of hovering males. The female is grasped by a male during flight, or while she is on vegetation before flight. Copulating pairs begin dispersal flights around 9 to 11 AM. Individuals may feed alone, or while in copula, on nectar or pollen in the vicinity of the emergence site. There are few or no mating pair flights by afternoon. By using traps 12.5 x 9.1 meters in area, it was determined that most lovebugs emerge from 6 to 9 PM with a smaller number emerging from 8:00 AM to 12 Noon (Thornhill 1976b). Eclosion from the pupal stage requires about 5.2 hours at 27°C for males and six hours for the females. Both sexes become fully sclerotized within two hours. Thornhill (1976b) did not report any positive evidence for the emission of a sex pheromone by either sex during or proceeding copulation. Males apparently hover near their emergence sits and use visual and perhaps auditory cues to locate the opposite sex.
swarm
Copulatory behavior begins with the male darting and grasping a female that is flying through the swarm. The pair falls to the ground where they couple. Initially the male is positioned on the back of the female and both sexes face the same direction. After coupling, the male turns 180° and faces the opposite direction. Successful genitalic engagement takes from 1.5 to 10 min. There is intense competition among males for females at emergence sites. Hovering males may grasp and attempt to disrupt copulation pairs flying in the vicinity. Larger males are more successful in disrupting copulating pairs. It was also observed that the larger females laid more eggs. Marked copulating pairs were collected up to three days after their release. In nature, pairs were never observed to disengage in flight or at night, but termination was observed in the daytime on vegetation. Second matings were observed in the laboratory when a virgin of the opposite sex as provided. Females that mate once usually lay their eggs and die after an average of 68 hours. Females that mated twice before laying eggs lived for a mean of 86 hours. Maximum sperm transfer requires about 12.5 hours.
P. nearctica is beneficial in the larval stages in helping recycle organic matter. The adult flies are a nuisance to motorists because the flies are attracted to highways and spatter on the hood and windshield of automobiles. Large number of lovebugs can cause overheating of liquid-cooled engines, reduce visibility, and etch automobile paint. The body fluids are slightly acid; however, if the egg mass (average about 350 per female; Hetrick 1970a) and body parts are allowed to remain on the car for several days, bacterial action increases the acidity and etches the paint. A soaking with water for about five minutes followed by a scrubbing within 15 to 20 minutes should remove most of the lovebugs without harm to automobile paint. A hood air deflector or screen will reduce the number of spattered lovebugs on an automobile.
car hood
car windshield
The larvae develop under dead, partially decayed plant material, particularly in moist to damp areas and in pastures under cow manure.
Local reduction of annual burning of woodlands, the development of improved pastures, and the increase of cattle probably have contributed to the presence of larger populations of lovebugs. Chemical controls are ineffective as the lovebug is widespread and they continually drift onto highways from adjacent areas. The degree of natural control and the amount of annual rainfall causes fluctuation in the population. Kish et al. (1977) isolated and identified three kinds of fungi from dead lovebugs collected in Alachua County, Florida. These fungi were Tolypocladium cylindrosporum W. Gams, Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok, and Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. Tests demonstrated that each fungus apparently affected larval mortality; however, data analyses indicated that only B. bassiana caused significant mortality levels (27 to 33%). Nine additional fungi were reported from dead or moribund larvae collected in the field. These fungi are likely important in the natural control of lovebugs. Further study is needed to determine how these fungi or other organisms may be used to control lovebugs.
- Buschman LL. 1976. Invasion of Florida by the "lovebug," Plecia nearctica (Diptera: Bibionidae). Florida Entomologist 59: 191-194.
- Callahan PS, Denmark HA. 1973. Attraction of the "lovebug," Plecia nearctica (Diptera: Bibionidae) to UV irradiated automobile exhaust fumes. Florida Entomologist 56: 113-119.
- Callahan PS, Denmark HA. 1974. The "lovebug" phenomenon. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Conference on Ecological Animal Control by Habitat Management (March 1973). 5: 93-101.
- Callahan PS, Carlysle TC, Denmark HA. 1985. Mechanism of attraction of the lovebug, Plecia nearctica, to southern highways: further evidence for the IR-dielectric waveguide theory of insect olfaction. Applied Optics 24: 1088-1093.
- Chambers SM. 1977. Genetic characteristics of a colonizing episode in the lovebug, Plecia nearctica. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 70: 537-540.
- Driggers DP, Short DE. 1971. "Lovebugs" in Florida. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Florida Cooperative Extension Service Circular 360, 4 pp.
- Evans HE. 1985. The lovebug. In: The Pleasures of Entomology. Portraits of Insects and the People who Study Them. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 238 pp.
- Fasulo TR, Kern W, Koehler PG, Short DE. (2005). Pests In and Around the Home. Version 2.0. University of Florida/IFAS. CD-ROM. SW 126.
- Hardy DE. 1940. Studies in New World Plecia (Bibionidae: Diptera). Part I. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 13: 15-27.
- Hardy DE. 1945. Revision of Nearctic Bibionidae including Neotropical Plecia and Penthetria (Diptera). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 30, Pt. II, No. 15: 367-547.
- Hardy DE. 1966. Family Bibionidae. In: A catalog of the Diptera of the Americas south of the United States. Departmento de Zoologia, Secretaria da Agricultura;, Sao Paulo. 18: 1-20.
- Hetrick LA. 1970a. Biology of the "lovebug," Plecia nearctica (Diptera: Bibionidae). Florida Entomologist 53: 23-26.
- Hetrick LA. 1970b. The "lovebug," Plecia nearctica Hardy (Diptera: Bibionidae). Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Entomology Circular No. 102, 2 pp.
- Hieber CS, Cohen JA. 1983. Sexual selection in the lovebug, Plecia nearctica: The role of male choice. Evolution 37: 987-992.
- Kish LP, Allen GE, Kimbrough JW, Kuitert LC. 1974. A survey of fungi associated with the lovebug, Plecia nearctica, in Florida. Florida Entomologist 57: 281-284.
- Kish LP, Terry I, Allen GE. 1977. Three fungi tested against the lovebug, Plecia nearctica, in Florida. Florida Entomologist 60: 291-295.
- Kuitert LC. 1975. Sexual dimorphism in Plecia nearctica pupae (Diptera: Bibionidae)-(Note). Florida Entomologist 58: 212.
- Leppla NE, Sharp JL, Turner WK, Hamilton EW, Bennett DR. 1974. Rhythmic activity of Plecia nearctica. Environmental Entomology 3: 323-326.
- Leppla NC, Carlysle TC, Guy RH. 1975. Reproductive systems and the mechanics of copulation in Plecia nearctica Hardy (Diptera: Bibionidae). International Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 4: 299-306.
- Leppla NE. (2007). Living with Lovebugs. EDIS. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/IN694 (22 March 2007).
- Mousseau TA. (2006). Love Bugs on the Move. http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/luvbug.html (17 May 2007).
- Rotramel G. 1969. Orientation and coupling in Dilophus orbatus (Diptera: Bibionidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 45: 74.
- Sharp JL, Leppla NC, Bennett DR, Turner WK, Hamilton EW. 1974. Flight ability of Plecia nearctica in the laboratory. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 67: 735-738.
- Thompson FC. 1975. "Lovebugs," a review of the nearctic species of Plecia (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Bibionidae). U.S.D.A., Cooperative Economic Insect Report. 25: 87-91.
- Thornhill R. 1976a. Biology and reproductive behavior of Dilophus sayi (Diptera: Bibionidae). Florida Entomologist 59: 1-4.
- Thornhill R. 1976b. Reproductive behavior of the lovebug, Plecia nearctica (Diptera: Bibionidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 69: 843-847.
- Trimble JJ. 1974. Ultrastructure of the ejaculatory duct region of the lovebug, Plecia nearctica Hardy. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 3: 353-359.
- Van Handel E. 1976. Metabolism of the "lovebug" Plecia nearctica (Diptera: Bibionidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 69: 215-216.
- Whitesell JJ. 1974. Heat, sound, and engine exhaust as "lovebug" attractants (Diptera: Bibionidae: Plecia nearctica). Environmental Entomology 3: 1038-1039.
Authors: H.A. Denmark and F.W. Mead, Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry.
Originally published as DPI Entomology Circular 350.
Photographs by: James Castner, University of Florida
Drawings of head, wings and genetalia: F.C. Thompson
Project Coordinator: Thomas R. Fasulo, University of Florida
Publication Number: EENY-47
Publication Date: August 1998. Latest revision: May 2007.
Copyright 1998-2007 University of Florida
Featured Creatures
Department of Entomology and Nematology
Division of Plant Industry
Electronic Data Information Source